TY - JOUR
T1 - Nonvariational calculation of the relativistic, finite-size, and QED corrections for the 2 1S excited state of the helium atom
AU - Haftel, M. I.
AU - Mandelzweig, V. B.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - Relativistic and QED corrections are calculated by using a direct solution of the Schrödinger equation for the 2 1S excited state of the helium atom obtained with the correlation-function hyperspherical-harmonic method. Our extremely accurate nonvariational results for relativistic, QED, and finite-size corrections coincide exactly (up to 0.000 03 cm-1) with the values obtained in precision variational calculations of Drake [Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 5, 2207 (1988)] and Baker, Hill, and Morgan [in Relativistic, Quantum Electrodynamic and Weak Interaction Effects in Atoms, edited by Walter Johnson, Peter Mohr, and Joseph Sucher, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 189 (AIP, New York, 1989), p. 123] for both infinite and finite nuclear masses. This confirms that a discrepancy of 0.0033 cm-1 between theory and experiment is not a result of an inaccuracy of variational wave functions, but is rooted in our inadequate knowledge of the QED operators. A better understanding of the different QED contributions to the operators (such as, for example, a more precise estimate of the Bethe logarithm) is therefore needed to explain the discrepancy.
AB - Relativistic and QED corrections are calculated by using a direct solution of the Schrödinger equation for the 2 1S excited state of the helium atom obtained with the correlation-function hyperspherical-harmonic method. Our extremely accurate nonvariational results for relativistic, QED, and finite-size corrections coincide exactly (up to 0.000 03 cm-1) with the values obtained in precision variational calculations of Drake [Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 5, 2207 (1988)] and Baker, Hill, and Morgan [in Relativistic, Quantum Electrodynamic and Weak Interaction Effects in Atoms, edited by Walter Johnson, Peter Mohr, and Joseph Sucher, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 189 (AIP, New York, 1989), p. 123] for both infinite and finite nuclear masses. This confirms that a discrepancy of 0.0033 cm-1 between theory and experiment is not a result of an inaccuracy of variational wave functions, but is rooted in our inadequate knowledge of the QED operators. A better understanding of the different QED contributions to the operators (such as, for example, a more precise estimate of the Bethe logarithm) is therefore needed to explain the discrepancy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5544324853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.49.3338
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.49.3338
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:5544324853
SN - 1050-2947
VL - 49
SP - 3338
EP - 3343
JO - Physical Review A
JF - Physical Review A
IS - 5
ER -