Abstract
This paper suggests an interpretation of the position Husserl takes in Logical Investigations with regard to the nature of natural numbers. The proposed interpretation is based on Kit Fine’s defense of a Cantorian conception of natural numbers. Although Fine’s position is not put forward as an interpretation of Husserl’s conception of natural numbers, nor can it be seen as such, I argue that it provides an excellent foundation for interpreting Husserl’s position.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy |
| Subtitle of host publication | Volume 18, Special Issue: Gian-Carlo Rota and The End of Objectivity, 2019 |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 537-545 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Volume | 18 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781000293234 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781000293357 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 selection and editorial matter, Burt C. Hopkins and John J. Drummond; individual chapters, the contributors.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Number as ideal species: Husserlian and contemporary perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver