Oesophageal sarcomas in dogs: Histological and clinical evaluation

Eyal Ranen*, Gillian Dank, Eran Lavy, Samuel Perl, Dan Lahav, Uri Orgad

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

A histological grading system of oesophageal sarcomas has not been established. Thirty-two cases of oesophageal sarcomas have been reviewed for tumour characteristics and clinical outcome. Nineteen dogs underwent surgical intervention to remove oesophageal tumours; ten of them survived (median 278 days). Primary tumour types included osteosarcoma (47%), osteosarcoma with tumour giant cells (7%), fibroblastic osteosarcoma (13%), chondroblastic osteosarcoma (7%) fibrosarcoma (23%) and undifferentiated sarcoma (3%). Histological grade evaluation revealed 33% grade 1 sarcoma, 50% grade 2 and 17% grade 3. No correlation could be found between survival and signalment, duration of clinical signs, tumour type, tumour grade and chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was found to reduce lung metastases' histological scores in three cases (P = 0.0007). Surgery seems to be the treatment of choice but the effect of chemotherapy warrants further investigation. Additional research of cases should be performed in order to further define prognostic factors of oesophageal sarcomas.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)78-84
Number of pages7
JournalVeterinary Journal
Volume178
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Keywords

  • Dogs
  • Fibrosarcoma
  • Grading system
  • Oesophageal sarcoma
  • Osteosarcoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oesophageal sarcomas in dogs: Histological and clinical evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this