On some similarities between contingency table methods and grouped data survival analytic techniques

Zvi Gilula*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Some similarities and equivalences between methods for analyzing contingency tables and techniques for analyzing grouped survival data are discussed. Attention is focused on models of homogeneity, piecewise homogeneity and models of accelerated failure rates. It is shown that under certain types of censoring, grouped data survival analytic techniques for these models are practically equivalent to methods common in contingency tables analysis with respect to models of independence, quasi-independence and uniform association models, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-211
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference
Volume14
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986

Keywords

  • Association models
  • Contingency tables
  • Counted data
  • Survival analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On some similarities between contingency table methods and grouped data survival analytic techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this