Abstract
I argue—from a Humean perspective—for the falsity of what I call the “Admissibility of Historical Information Thesis” (AHIT). According to the AHIT, propositions that describe past events are always admissible with respect to propositions that describe future events. I first demonstrate that this thesis has some counter-intuitive implications and argue that a Humean can explain the intuitive attractiveness of the AHIT by arguing that it results from a wrong understanding of the concept of chance. I then demonstrate how a Humean “best system” analysis of chance predicts the existence of inadmissible historical information and discuss the implications of this conclusion to the debate between Humeans and non-Humeans.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 479-493 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research |
Volume | 97 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LLC