On the notion of historical (dis)continuity: Reinhart Koselleck's construction of the Sattelzeit

Gabriel Motzkin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The author contends that a transition period is conceived in terms of its continuity with preceding or subsequent periods, rather than an entirely discontinuous temporal unit. Thus, in order to conceive of a period of transition, one must assume an overarching historical continuity. This contrasts with Reinhart Koselleck's and Michel Foucault's conception of the period of transition to modernity which is at once a break and part of the modern period. By analyzing how time is experienced in terms of contemporary awareness and retrospective consciousness, the author maps out the epistemological determinations that allow for the conception of a period of transition to modernity such as Sattelzeit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-158
Number of pages14
JournalContributions to the History of Concepts
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Keywords

  • Historical continuity
  • Michel Foucault
  • Periods of transition
  • Reinhart Koselleck
  • Sattelzeit

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the notion of historical (dis)continuity: Reinhart Koselleck's construction of the Sattelzeit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this