Abstract
The author contends that a transition period is conceived in terms of its continuity with preceding or subsequent periods, rather than an entirely discontinuous temporal unit. Thus, in order to conceive of a period of transition, one must assume an overarching historical continuity. This contrasts with Reinhart Koselleck's and Michel Foucault's conception of the period of transition to modernity which is at once a break and part of the modern period. By analyzing how time is experienced in terms of contemporary awareness and retrospective consciousness, the author maps out the epistemological determinations that allow for the conception of a period of transition to modernity such as Sattelzeit.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 145-158 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Contributions to the History of Concepts |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2005 |
Keywords
- Historical continuity
- Michel Foucault
- Periods of transition
- Reinhart Koselleck
- Sattelzeit
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the notion of historical (dis)continuity: Reinhart Koselleck's construction of the Sattelzeit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver