TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal multi-period insurance contracts
AU - Venezia, Itzhak
AU - Levy, Haim
PY - 1983/7
Y1 - 1983/7
N2 - In multi-period insurance contracts (such as automobile insurance contracts), unlike single-period ones, the premiums that the insured must pay increase whenever he files a claim. Hence, the buyer faces a problem that is absent in one-period models, namely: he must determine for which damages he should file a claim and for which he should not. The optimal claims policy of the buyer is presented for a large class of insurance contracts. It is shown that the buyer will file a claim only if it is larger than some critical value. Based on this it is shown that the buyer prefers a contract that provides full coverage above a deductible for damages that exceed his critical value. In this case the optimal contract is not unique since the buyer is indifferent to the form of the contract for damages below his critical value. It is shown, however, that as in one-period models (Arrow (1963, 1974)) there exists an optimal contract that provides full coverage above a deductible. In multi-period setting, however, the buyer will file a claim only if the damage is sufficiently higher than the deductible. It is also shown that the buyer prefers a strictly positive deductible. Unlike the one-period case (Mossin (1968)), this result holds true even if the premium rates equal the expected payments.
AB - In multi-period insurance contracts (such as automobile insurance contracts), unlike single-period ones, the premiums that the insured must pay increase whenever he files a claim. Hence, the buyer faces a problem that is absent in one-period models, namely: he must determine for which damages he should file a claim and for which he should not. The optimal claims policy of the buyer is presented for a large class of insurance contracts. It is shown that the buyer will file a claim only if it is larger than some critical value. Based on this it is shown that the buyer prefers a contract that provides full coverage above a deductible for damages that exceed his critical value. In this case the optimal contract is not unique since the buyer is indifferent to the form of the contract for damages below his critical value. It is shown, however, that as in one-period models (Arrow (1963, 1974)) there exists an optimal contract that provides full coverage above a deductible. In multi-period setting, however, the buyer will file a claim only if the damage is sufficiently higher than the deductible. It is also shown that the buyer prefers a strictly positive deductible. Unlike the one-period case (Mossin (1968)), this result holds true even if the premium rates equal the expected payments.
KW - Deductible
KW - Optimal critical claim size
KW - Premiums
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847368410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0167-6687(83)90012-4
DO - 10.1016/0167-6687(83)90012-4
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:33847368410
SN - 0167-6687
VL - 2
SP - 199
EP - 208
JO - Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
JF - Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
IS - 3
ER -