TY - JOUR
T1 - Orthodontic tooth movement through regenerative sites
T2 - A 25-year systematic review
AU - Klein, Yehuda
AU - Silker, Michal Kimelman
AU - Leibovich, Avi
AU - Polak, David
AU - Stabholz, Ayala
AU - Casap, Nardy
AU - Chaushu, Stella
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/5
Y1 - 2024/5
N2 - This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) through bone regenerated with osteoconductive grafts, together with the risk of root resorption (RR), in relation to the material and the timing of force initiation. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, three major electronic databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane). Only studies which reported on the primary outcome (OTM rate) were included. Investigations with fewer than 3 participants/groups and an absence of controls were excluded. The final sample consisted of 16 randomized and controlled clinical trials. Among them, 9 reported on RR (the secondary outcome). The articles showed substantial heterogeneity and low-moderate quality. Most studied OTM through alloplasts (7) and xenografts (8), 3 addressed allografts, 3 autografts and 6 analyzed 2 grafts. Timing for force initiation varied from 0 to 13 weeks post-grafting. Based on limited evidence, it can be cautiously concluded that most graft materials have either no impact or slightly impair OTM, with no significant increase in RR. Xenografts might impede OTM and increase RR risk. The optimal timing for force application depends on the state of bone healing. Future studies are mandatory for deciding on the ideal graft and timing for optimal OTM in each clinical setup.
AB - This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) through bone regenerated with osteoconductive grafts, together with the risk of root resorption (RR), in relation to the material and the timing of force initiation. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, three major electronic databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane). Only studies which reported on the primary outcome (OTM rate) were included. Investigations with fewer than 3 participants/groups and an absence of controls were excluded. The final sample consisted of 16 randomized and controlled clinical trials. Among them, 9 reported on RR (the secondary outcome). The articles showed substantial heterogeneity and low-moderate quality. Most studied OTM through alloplasts (7) and xenografts (8), 3 addressed allografts, 3 autografts and 6 analyzed 2 grafts. Timing for force initiation varied from 0 to 13 weeks post-grafting. Based on limited evidence, it can be cautiously concluded that most graft materials have either no impact or slightly impair OTM, with no significant increase in RR. Xenografts might impede OTM and increase RR risk. The optimal timing for force application depends on the state of bone healing. Future studies are mandatory for deciding on the ideal graft and timing for optimal OTM in each clinical setup.
KW - Allograft
KW - Alloplast
KW - Autograft
KW - Bone graft
KW - Bone regeneration
KW - Orthodontic tooth movement
KW - Root resorption
KW - Xenograft
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186663028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.003
DO - 10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.003
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85186663028
SN - 1073-8746
VL - 30
SP - 150
EP - 161
JO - Seminars in Orthodontics
JF - Seminars in Orthodontics
IS - 2
ER -