TY - JOUR
T1 - Patterns of alliance development in cognitive behavioral therapy versus attention bias modification for social anxiety disorder
T2 - Sawtooth patterns and sudden gains
AU - Kivity, Yogev
AU - Strauss, Asher Y.
AU - Elizur, Jonathan
AU - Weiss, Michal
AU - Cohen, Lior
AU - Huppert, Jonathan D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Objectives: We examined patterns in alliance development in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD) compared to attention bias modification (ABM). We focused on the occurrence of sawtooth patterns (increases within- and decreases between-sessions) and sudden gains and their association with outcome. Methods: Clients received CBT (n = 33) or ABM (n = 17). Client-rated alliance was measured before and after each session. Self-reported and clinician-rated anxiety were measured weekly and monthly, respectively. Results: The alliance increased in CBT in a sawtooth pattern and did not change in ABM. When examining individual clients, sawtooths were more common in CBT (61% clients) than in ABM (6%) and predicted worse outcome in CBT. Sudden gains were equally frequent (CBT, 18%; ABM, 18%) and did not predict outcome. Conclusion: The alliance in CBT is dynamic and important for outcome. Sawtooths are common in CBT and may mark worse outcome.
AB - Objectives: We examined patterns in alliance development in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD) compared to attention bias modification (ABM). We focused on the occurrence of sawtooth patterns (increases within- and decreases between-sessions) and sudden gains and their association with outcome. Methods: Clients received CBT (n = 33) or ABM (n = 17). Client-rated alliance was measured before and after each session. Self-reported and clinician-rated anxiety were measured weekly and monthly, respectively. Results: The alliance increased in CBT in a sawtooth pattern and did not change in ABM. When examining individual clients, sawtooths were more common in CBT (61% clients) than in ABM (6%) and predicted worse outcome in CBT. Sudden gains were equally frequent (CBT, 18%; ABM, 18%) and did not predict outcome. Conclusion: The alliance in CBT is dynamic and important for outcome. Sawtooths are common in CBT and may mark worse outcome.
KW - alliance–outcome correlation
KW - cognitive behavioral therapy
KW - social anxiety disorder
KW - sudden gains
KW - therapeutic alliance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110962896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jclp.23219
DO - 10.1002/jclp.23219
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34297850
AN - SCOPUS:85110962896
SN - 0021-9762
VL - 78
SP - 122
EP - 136
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychology
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychology
IS - 2
ER -