TY - JOUR
T1 - Perspectives
T2 - Effect of global change drivers on carbon fluxes and resilience of European forests
AU - Gharun, Mana
AU - Angove, Charlotte
AU - Migliavacca, Mirco
AU - Zhou, Yu
AU - Buckeridge, Kate
AU - Branquinho, Cristina
AU - Collalti, Alessio
AU - Nybakken, Line
AU - Zhiyanski, Miglena
AU - Sarginci, Murat
AU - Koc, Ismail
AU - Donmez, Abdullah Huseyin
AU - López-Ballesteros, Ana
AU - Godbold, Douglas
AU - Machacova, Katerina
AU - Guidi, Claudia
AU - Koren, Gerbrand
AU - Ostonen, Ivika
AU - Sell, Marili
AU - Pers-Kamczyc, Emilia
AU - Kamczyc, Jacek
AU - Aslan, Toprak
AU - Preece, Catherine
AU - Prikaziuk, Egor
AU - Özkan, Ufuk
AU - Vitali, Valentina
AU - Havrdová, Alena
AU - Grünzweig, José M.
AU - Tomelleri, Enrico
AU - Ullah, Sami
AU - Stoeva, Lora
AU - Nestola, Enrica
AU - Vanguelova, Elena
AU - Guerrieri, Rossella
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Authors
PY - 2026/9/15
Y1 - 2026/9/15
N2 - European forests play a central role for meeting the EU's climate targets, but the declining carbon sink has left them trailing behind climate goals. Reversing this trend requires a systematic understanding of forest responses to shifting global change drivers, explicitly integrating aboveground and belowground processes. Here, we provide our perspective on the effects of multiple global change drivers on ecosystem-scale carbon fluxes (including both carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4)) and the resilience of these fluxes, based on direct flux observations (e.g., from eddy covariance towers). First, we present changes in several key drivers (warming, drought, atmospheric CO2, nitrogen deposition, winter warming, excess precipitation, late frost), over recent decades, some of which (winter warming, windthrow, excess precipitation, late frost) have received limited attention in forest carbon assessments. Some of these—such as winter warming—are expected to become increasingly frequent in the future. We then explicitly summarize how the four (more-frequently studied) key drivers affect carbon fluxes (i.e., CO2 and CH4 fluxes). The response of the net CO2 sink (i.e., net ecosystem productivity) is presented through its two component processes: gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco). When considered individually, global change drivers often produce relatively predictable responses in forest carbon fluxes: warming tends to enhance both GPP and Reco, elevated atmospheric CO₂ generally stimulates photosynthesis, and moderate nitrogen (N) inputs can enhance productivity in N-limited systems. However, when drivers interact, ecosystem responses frequently become non-linear, amplified, or even reversed relative to single-driver expectations. For example, warming alone may extend the growing season and increase GPP, but in combination with drought, elevated vapor pressure deficit suppresses stomatal conductance, reduces GPP, and can increase respiration losses during rewetting events. Similarly, the positive effect of rising CO₂ on productivity may be constrained by nutrient limitation or drought stress, while historical N deposition can temporarily sustain CO₂ fertilization effects but also increase vulnerability to climatic stressors. Under compound disturbances—such as drought followed by extreme precipitation or winter warming—ecosystem respiration pulses and structural damage can further reduce net ecosystem productivity (NEP). Collectively, these findings indicate that forest carbon dynamics cannot be reliably inferred from single-driver responses alone; instead, interacting drivers shape ecosystem resilience through feedbacks among physiological processes, soil biogeochemistry, and disturbance regimes, often leading to thresholds or tipping points in carbon sink strength.
AB - European forests play a central role for meeting the EU's climate targets, but the declining carbon sink has left them trailing behind climate goals. Reversing this trend requires a systematic understanding of forest responses to shifting global change drivers, explicitly integrating aboveground and belowground processes. Here, we provide our perspective on the effects of multiple global change drivers on ecosystem-scale carbon fluxes (including both carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4)) and the resilience of these fluxes, based on direct flux observations (e.g., from eddy covariance towers). First, we present changes in several key drivers (warming, drought, atmospheric CO2, nitrogen deposition, winter warming, excess precipitation, late frost), over recent decades, some of which (winter warming, windthrow, excess precipitation, late frost) have received limited attention in forest carbon assessments. Some of these—such as winter warming—are expected to become increasingly frequent in the future. We then explicitly summarize how the four (more-frequently studied) key drivers affect carbon fluxes (i.e., CO2 and CH4 fluxes). The response of the net CO2 sink (i.e., net ecosystem productivity) is presented through its two component processes: gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco). When considered individually, global change drivers often produce relatively predictable responses in forest carbon fluxes: warming tends to enhance both GPP and Reco, elevated atmospheric CO₂ generally stimulates photosynthesis, and moderate nitrogen (N) inputs can enhance productivity in N-limited systems. However, when drivers interact, ecosystem responses frequently become non-linear, amplified, or even reversed relative to single-driver expectations. For example, warming alone may extend the growing season and increase GPP, but in combination with drought, elevated vapor pressure deficit suppresses stomatal conductance, reduces GPP, and can increase respiration losses during rewetting events. Similarly, the positive effect of rising CO₂ on productivity may be constrained by nutrient limitation or drought stress, while historical N deposition can temporarily sustain CO₂ fertilization effects but also increase vulnerability to climatic stressors. Under compound disturbances—such as drought followed by extreme precipitation or winter warming—ecosystem respiration pulses and structural damage can further reduce net ecosystem productivity (NEP). Collectively, these findings indicate that forest carbon dynamics cannot be reliably inferred from single-driver responses alone; instead, interacting drivers shape ecosystem resilience through feedbacks among physiological processes, soil biogeochemistry, and disturbance regimes, often leading to thresholds or tipping points in carbon sink strength.
KW - Air pollution
KW - Climate extremes
KW - Drought
KW - Ecosystem
KW - Gross primary productivity
KW - Heatwave
KW - Nitrogen deposition
KW - Respiration
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105039917993
U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2026.123844
DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2026.123844
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:105039917993
SN - 0378-1127
VL - 616
JO - Forest Ecology and Management
JF - Forest Ecology and Management
M1 - 123844
ER -