@inbook{786325ea1c6943c7a784afbb6cbf283d,
title = "Picking Battles: Race, Decolonization, and Apartheid",
abstract = "Race is one of the more ubiquitous, yet least explored, shifts in twentieth-century international law. From law that was founded in key areas and concepts on racial distinctions, international law quickly came to denounce various manifestations of race theories and racial discrimination. The establishment of the UN reflected a racialized understanding of the international society assumptions of the League of Nations mandate system. The 1948 Universal Declaration addressed entitlement to human rights without distinction of race, yet the Genocide Convention extended protection to racial (identity of) minority groups. In South Africa, race policies provided both the impetus and multiple occasions for formulating claims about a new, de-racialized international law from 1946 onwards. At these struggles against apartheid, binary political confrontations could take form as competing visions of international law, both old and new. This chapter charts the sites of contestation over apartheid and its effects on international law.",
keywords = "history of international law, decolonization, racism, apartheid, mandate system, United Nations, human rights, genocide, anti-Semitism, Israel, Public International Law",
author = "Rotem Giladi",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1093/oso/9780198849636.003.0010",
language = "American English",
isbn = "9780198849636",
series = "History and theory of international law",
publisher = "Oxford University Press (OUP)",
pages = "216–C9.N*",
editor = "{von Bernstorff}, Jochen and Philipp Dann",
booktitle = "The Battle for International Law",
}