Planning democracy in Africa: A comparative perspective on Nigeria and Ghana

Naomi Chazan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ghana and Nigeria are in the midst of government-initiated democratization programs. This paper compares the different settings, reasons, strategies, procedures, and implementation of democratization efforts in these two countries. While Nigeria's comprehensive approach to democratic planning has enabled elite continuity, it has neither assured regime stability nor enhanced state capacities. In contrast, Ghana's plan for democratic transformation, pursued in a piecemeal fashion, has resulted in regime stability and some state consolidation, but not in democratization. In both countries, there is little doubt that the unintended consequences of each approach may prove more significant than the direct results of successful policy implementation. Thus, even if the specific design for democracy may fail, the democratic project in these West African states may nevertheless be progressing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-357
Number of pages33
JournalPolicy Sciences
Volume22
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1989

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Planning democracy in Africa: A comparative perspective on Nigeria and Ghana'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this