Power effects on cognitive control: Turning conflict into action

Petra C. Schmid*, Tali Kleiman, David M. Amodio

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Power is known to promote effective goal pursuit, especially when it requires one to overcome distractions or bias. We proposed that this effect involves the ability to engage and implement cognitive control. In Study 1, we demonstrated that power enhances behavioral performance on a response conflict task and that it does so by enhancing controlled processing rather than by reducing automatic processing. In Study 2, we used an event-related potential index of anterior cingulate activity to test whether power effects on control were due to enhanced conflict sensitivity or action implementation. Power did not significantly affect neural sensitivity to conflict; rather, high power was associated with a stronger link between conflict processing and intended action, relative to low power. These findings suggest a new perspective on how social factors can affect controlled processing and offer new evidence regarding the transition between conflict detection and the implementation of action control.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)655-663
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume144
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Psychological Association.

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Control
  • Event-related potential (ERP)
  • Goals
  • Social power

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Power effects on cognitive control: Turning conflict into action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this