Abstract
We show that the price wars following two major entry episodes were predatory. Our proof is twofold: by direct comparison of price to marginal cost, and by construction of a lower bound to predicted competitive price-cost margins that we show to exceed observed margins. Predation occurred only when its relative cost to the dominant firm, the American Sugar Refining Company (ASRC), was small. Its most clear effect was to lower the acquisition price of entrants and small incumbents. It may also have deterred future capacity additions and raised ASRC's share of industry profits. Predation operated by strengthening ASRC's reputation as a willing predator.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 47-69 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | RAND Journal of Economics |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Predation and its rate of return: The sugar industry, 1887-1914'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver