Predicting Procedural Justice in Police–Citizen Encounters

Stephen D. Mastrofski*, Tal Jonathan-Zamir, Shomron Moyal, James J. Willis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Scopus citations


Police exercise great discretion in their dealings with the public, but most research on police discretion focuses on coercive decisions. Despite the demonstrated importance of procedural justice (PJ) for police legitimacy and overall satisfaction, the predictors of police-provided PJ in police–citizen encounters have rarely been examined. We propose a framework for assessing the choice of police officers to engage in PJ and test it using data collected in direct observations of police interactions with the public. We find significant effects for the moral “worthiness” of the citizen as reflected in his or her role in the situation; for situational challenges of engaging in PJ, including large audience and officer mental/emotional fatigue; and for popular scripts for handling traffic-related encounters and serving in a backup role. We interpret and discuss the implications of our findings and suggest avenues for advancing understanding of the factors underlying procedurally just police treatment.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)119-139
Number of pages21
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by a Fulbright Post-Doctoral Fellowship, awarded by the Fulbright commission in Israel, the United States–Israel Educational Foundation and by the Center for Justice Leadership and Management at George Mason University.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, 2015 International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology.


  • discretion
  • police
  • policing
  • procedural justice


Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting Procedural Justice in Police–Citizen Encounters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this