Prevalence and correlates of victimization and weapon carrying among military- and nonmilitary-connected youth in Southern California

Tamika D. Gilreath*, Ron A. Astor, Julie A. Cederbaum, Hazel Atuel, Rami Benbenishty

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The present analysis sought to explore the normative rates and correlates of school victimization and weapon carrying among military-connected and nonmilitary-connected youth in public schools in Southern California. Methods: Data are from a sub-sample of the 2011 California Healthy Kids Survey (N. = 14,512). Items to assess victimization and weapon carrying were separated into three categories: physical acts (e.g., being pushed or shoved), nonphysical acts (e.g., having rumors spread about them) and weapon carrying. Results: The bivariate results indicate that youth with a military-connected parent had higher rates of physical victimization (56.8%), nonphysical victimization (68.1%), and weapon carrying (14.4%) compared to those with siblings serving (55.2%, 65.2%, and 11.4%, respectively) and nonmilitary-connected (50.3%, 61.6%, and 8.9%, respectively) youth. Having a parent in the military increased the odds of weapon carrying by 29% (Odds Ratio. = 1.29, 95% confidence interval. = 1.02-1.65). Changing schools and a larger number of family member deployments in the past 10. years were associated with significant increases in the likelihood of victimization and weapon carrying. Conclusions: The results of this analysis warrant a focus on school supports for youth experiencing parental military service, multiple relocations and deployments of a family member.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-26
Number of pages6
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume60
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Military
  • School victimization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence and correlates of victimization and weapon carrying among military- and nonmilitary-connected youth in Southern California'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this