Abstract
The explicit treatment of heterogeneity among the users of the commons leads to results that differ from those that are now generally accepted in the literature. The owner of the fixed factor is not able to expropriate the rents of privatization. Rather, the resulting distribution of income to the free factor after privatization depends on the technology and the institutional arrangements. This result extends to more than two goods if the decline in the price of the good produced in the commons is sufficient to offset the decline in the marginal product of labor in the rest of the economy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 181-205 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Economics |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 May 1997 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Commons
- D33
- D62
- D82
- Distribution
- H23
- H41
- Heterogeneity
- Income
- Privatization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Privatization and the distribution of income in the commons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver