Probabilistic cause and the thirsty traveler

Igal Kvart*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper I start by briefly presenting an analysis of token cause and of token causal relevance that I developed elsewhere, and then apply it to the famous thirsty traveler riddle. One general outcome of the analysis of causal relevance employed here is that in preemption cases (early or late) the preempted cause is not a cause since it is causally irrelevant to the effect. I consider several variations of the thirsty traveler riddle. In the first variation the first enemy emptied the canteen and the second enemy threw it away. On this variation, the act of neither enemy comes out, on the analysis employed here, as causally relevant to, and thus not as a cause of, the fact that the traveler died, but the conjunction of the two acts is a cause of it. This version is a case of mutual preemption. I argue that it has the same structure as the voting paradox, which thus has an analogous solution. In the standard version, in which the first enemy added poison to the water in the traveler's canteen, the act of the second enemy (who threw the canteen away) comes out, on the analysis used here, as causally relevant to and as a cause of the fact that the traveler died, but the act of the first enemy comes out as neither. I also make a comparison with Lewis' accounts, and discuss alternative treatments of the puzzle such as those of Hart and Honore and of Gavison, Margalit, and Ullmann-Margalit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-179
Number of pages41
JournalJournal of Philosophical Logic
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Keywords

  • Causal relevance
  • Cause
  • Chance
  • Dehydration
  • Lewis
  • Mutual preemption
  • Neutralizer
  • Overdetermination
  • Poison
  • Preemption
  • Stable increaser
  • Stable screener
  • Thirsty traveler
  • Voting paradox

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Probabilistic cause and the thirsty traveler'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this