Prognostic markers in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Nir Hirshoren, Julia Danne, Benjamin John Dixon, Matthew Magarey, Stephen Kleid, Angela Webb, Albert Tiong, June Corry, David Gyorki*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The minority of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) metastasize to regional lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with node-positive head and neck cutaneous SCC who underwent lymphadenectomy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single center study using the Kaplan–Meier method for the investigation of the overall survival (OS) and locoregional control rates. The Cox proportional hazards model was evaluated to identify prognostic factors. Results: The median number of positive lymph nodes from 149 lymphadenectomies was 2 in the neck and 1 in the parotid gland. The 5-year OS and locoregional control rates were 50% and 77%, respectively. OS was worse among older patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; p =.015), immunosuppressed patients (HR, 2.06; p =.034), and patients with a high total lymph node ratio (calculated from the number of positive lymph nodes divided by the total number of nodes; multivariate analysis [MVA]; HR, 1.13; p =.019). Conclusion: Low total lymph node ratio is associated with improved outcomes in node-positive head and neck cutaneous SCC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)772-778
Number of pages7
JournalHead and Neck
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

  • cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
  • head and neck
  • lymph node ratio
  • prognostic parameters
  • radiation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic markers in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this