Abstract
Exposure to an outgroup member voicing criticism of his or her own group fosters greater openness to the outgroup’s perspective. Research suggests that this effect owes its influence to a serial process in which participants’ perception of the risk involved in voicing internal criticism leads to an increase in the perceived credibility of the speaker. The credibility makes it possible for the speaker to be viewed as open-minded, which subsequently inspires greater hope. This process culminates in an increased openness to the outgroup. These findings have been restricted to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but here we examine their generalizability to racial conflict in the United States. Results reveal that White Americans exposed to internal criticism expressed by a Black authority figure express greater openness to African-American perspectives on race relations and are more willing to support policies of racial equality. Replicating past research, this effect is serially mediated by risk, credibility, and hope.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 349-356 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 159 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 4 May 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Credibility
- criticism
- culture
- hope
- intergroup relations
- intervention
- openness
- prejudice
- risk
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Promoting intergroup openness and support for equality in a new cultural context: Replicating the effects of internal criticism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver