PROTOCOL: Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors

Michael Wolfowicz; Yael Litmanovitz; David Weisburd; Badi Hasisi

doi:10.1002/cl2.1102

PROTOCOL: Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors

Michael Wolfowicz^*, Yael Litmanovitz, David Weisburd, Badi Hasisi

^*Corresponding author for this work

Institute of Criminology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review seeks to collate and synthesize putative risk and protective factors for the different outcomes of radicalization. Methodology: Drawing on an established theoretical framework, we will categorize putative risk and protective factors as they relate to the domains of radical attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. We will utilize meta-analytic techniques to develop a rank-order of factors according to effect size. Meta-regression and sub-group analyses will be used to assess sources of heterogeneity. Implications: The results of the review are intended to inform evidence-based policy in the areas of both assessment and intervention.

Original language	English
Article number	e1102
Journal	Campbell Systematic Reviews
Volume	16
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1102
State	Published - 1 Sep 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Campbell Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Campbell Collaboration

Access to Document

10.1002/cl2.1102

Cite this

@article{a2c27b155eae439991d6bbd2512c031c,

title = "PROTOCOL: Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors",

abstract = "Objectives: This systematic review seeks to collate and synthesize putative risk and protective factors for the different outcomes of radicalization. Methodology: Drawing on an established theoretical framework, we will categorize putative risk and protective factors as they relate to the domains of radical attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. We will utilize meta-analytic techniques to develop a rank-order of factors according to effect size. Meta-regression and sub-group analyses will be used to assess sources of heterogeneity. Implications: The results of the review are intended to inform evidence-based policy in the areas of both assessment and intervention.",

author = "Michael Wolfowicz and Yael Litmanovitz and David Weisburd and Badi Hasisi",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors. Campbell Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Campbell Collaboration",

year = "2020",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/cl2.1102",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "16",

journal = "Campbell Systematic Reviews",

issn = "1891-1803",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PROTOCOL

T2 - Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors

AU - Wolfowicz, Michael

AU - Litmanovitz, Yael

AU - Weisburd, David

AU - Hasisi, Badi

PY - 2020/9/1

Y1 - 2020/9/1

N2 - Objectives: This systematic review seeks to collate and synthesize putative risk and protective factors for the different outcomes of radicalization. Methodology: Drawing on an established theoretical framework, we will categorize putative risk and protective factors as they relate to the domains of radical attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. We will utilize meta-analytic techniques to develop a rank-order of factors according to effect size. Meta-regression and sub-group analyses will be used to assess sources of heterogeneity. Implications: The results of the review are intended to inform evidence-based policy in the areas of both assessment and intervention.

AB - Objectives: This systematic review seeks to collate and synthesize putative risk and protective factors for the different outcomes of radicalization. Methodology: Drawing on an established theoretical framework, we will categorize putative risk and protective factors as they relate to the domains of radical attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. We will utilize meta-analytic techniques to develop a rank-order of factors according to effect size. Meta-regression and sub-group analyses will be used to assess sources of heterogeneity. Implications: The results of the review are intended to inform evidence-based policy in the areas of both assessment and intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091214939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cl2.1102

DO - 10.1002/cl2.1102

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???

AN - SCOPUS:85091214939

SN - 1891-1803

VL - 16

JO - Campbell Systematic Reviews

JF - Campbell Systematic Reviews

IS - 3

M1 - e1102

ER -

PROTOCOL: Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this