Abstract
We call a pseudorandom generator Gn:(0, 1)n→(0, 1)m hard for a propositional proof system P if P can not efficiently prove the (properly encoded) statement Gn(x1, …, xn)≠b for any string b∈(0, 1)m. We consider a variety of `combinatorial' pseudorandom generators inspired by the Nisan-Wigderson generator on the one hand, and by the construction of Tseitin tautologies on the other. We prove that under certain circumstances these generators are hard for such proof systems as Resolution, Polynomial Calculus and Polynomial Calculus with Resolution (PCR).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 43-53 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Proceedings - Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2000 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pseudorandom generators in propositional proof complexity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver