Psychophysiology in the Study of Political Communication: An Expository Study of Individual-Level Variation in Negativity Biases

Stuart Soroka*, Patrick Fournier, Lilach Nir, John Hibbing

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

The use of psychophysiological measures has been relatively common in the study of communication; there has been a recent increase in interest among political behavioralists as well. There has nevertheless been a limited body of work that uses psychophysiological measures to better understand the impact of political mass media content. This article presents the case for using psychophysiological measures to study political communication. Focusing on skin conductance, it outlines the advantages of this measure for capturing subconscious responses to media over time, second-to-second. It then presents results from recent experimental work in the United States that highlights individual-level variation in responsiveness to negative versus positive news content—variation that is correlated with measures of psychophysiological reactions to non-news content, suggesting the relevance of deep-seated predispositions in psychophysiological research on media effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)288-302
Number of pages15
JournalPolitical Communication
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Apr 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Copyright © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

  • biopolitics
  • media effects
  • methodology
  • negativity
  • psychophysiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychophysiology in the Study of Political Communication: An Expository Study of Individual-Level Variation in Negativity Biases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this