QUISTCLOSE TRUSTS FROM A CORPORATE INSOLVENCY PERSPECTIVE: A POSITIVE AND NORMATIVE ANALYSIS

Adam S. Hofri-Winogradow*, Gal David

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Leading cases show Quistclose trusts being used by companies nearing insolvency. Their use in this context raises serious normative problems: it may prefer the beneficiary to the company's other creditors, and creates a misleading impression that trust funds are in fact free of trust. Building on the emergent normative literature on Quistclose trusts, we first examine which Quistclose trusts are currently allowed under company law and the law of corporate insolvency. We then discuss the normative question as to which Quistclose trusts should be allowed, given the principles of these branches of the law.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)524-549
Number of pages26
JournalCambridge Law Journal
Volume81
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Authors, 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge.

Keywords

  • Quistclose trusts
  • company law
  • corporate insolvency
  • creditors
  • directors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'QUISTCLOSE TRUSTS FROM A CORPORATE INSOLVENCY PERSPECTIVE: A POSITIVE AND NORMATIVE ANALYSIS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this