Randomized vs. deterministic decision tree complexity for read-once Boolean functions

Rafi Heiman*, Avi Wigderson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors consider the deterministic and the randomized decision-tree complexities for Boolean functions, denoted DC(f) and RC(f), respectively. It is well known that RC(f ≥ DC(f)0.5 for every Boolean function f (called 0.5-exponent), but no better lower bound is known for all Boolean functions, whereas the best known upper bound is RC(f) = Θ(DC(f) 0.753...) (or 0.753...-exponent) for some Boolean function f. The present result is a 0.51 lower bound on the exponent for all read-once functions representable by formulae in which each input variable appears exactly once. To obtain it the authors generalize an existing lower bound technique and combine it with restrictions arguments. This result provides a lower bound of n0.51 on the number of positions that have to be evaluated by any randomized α-β pruning algorithm computing the value of any two-person zero-sum game tree with n final positions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProc 6 Annu Struct Complexity Theor
PublisherPubl by IEEE
Pages172-179
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)0818622555
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 6th Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference - Chicago, IL, USA
Duration: 30 Jun 19913 Jul 1991

Publication series

NameProc 6 Annu Struct Complexity Theor

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of the 6th Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference
CityChicago, IL, USA
Period30/06/913/07/91

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized vs. deterministic decision tree complexity for read-once Boolean functions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this