Reasons of Love: A Case Against Universalism About Practical Reason

Oded Na'Aman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The paper presents an argument from love against universalism about practical reason, that is, the view that an agent's practical reasons normatively supervene on the agent's circumstances. Universalism explains the different reasons you and I have by citing differences in our properties, circumstances, relationships, etc. It thus rejects the possibility that the normative differences between us are basic. But love seems to make such basic distinctions, for it gives us special reasons with regard to particular individuals as such. To establish this, I criticize Niko Kolodny's relationship theory, which accounts for reasons of love in universal terms. Then I suggest that any universalist account will fail in the same way.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)315-322
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the Aristotelean Society
Volume115
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Aristotelian Society.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reasons of Love: A Case Against Universalism About Practical Reason'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this