Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recasting the Meaning of Elections: Three Strikes for the Mandate Interpretation in Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

How are we to interpret the rising popularity of right-wing populist and outright authoritarian parties in European democracies? Commonly, elections are seen as handing a mandate to their winners. So, are such forces increasingly receiving a mandate from voters to carry out their policies? This article reviews three recent books (Authoritarianism and the Evolution of West European Electoral Politics by Erik R. Tillman, Democracy Erodes from the Top by Larry M. Bartels, and Voters under Pressure by Ruth Dassonneville) and argues that the mandate interpretation strikes out. These books illustrate how politicians shape “mandates,” how “mandates” can be ignored by those in power, and how the party system and the electorate are not structured (anymore) in a way to allow for genuine mandates to emerge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-234
Number of pages24
JournalComparative Politics
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2026 The City University of New York.

Keywords

  • democracy
  • elections
  • electoral behavior
  • electoral mandate
  • right-wing populism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recasting the Meaning of Elections: Three Strikes for the Mandate Interpretation in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this