Recycled effluent: Should the polluter pay?

Eli Feinerman*, Yakir Plessner, Dafna M. DiSegni Eshel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

A coastal city can either dispose of recycled effluent by dumping it in the sea, or transfer it to farmers in its hinterland for irrigation. Who should bear the cost of recycling? Three alternatives are employed: a central planner who maximizes the combined utility of city and farmers; regulation by prices, for which purpose we develop the city's supply function; and a bargaining framework for the allocation of costs. The main conclusions are that "the polluter pays" rule cannot be justified in principle and that bargaining may result in inefficiency. We demonstrate with an example from Israel that essentially conforms to the theoretical structure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)958-971
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Keywords

  • City behavior
  • Cost allocation patterns
  • Farmer behavior
  • Institutional arrangements
  • Recycled effluent

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recycled effluent: Should the polluter pay?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this