Abstract
Commissions of inquiry play an important role in the aftermath of crisis, by serving as instruments of accountability and policy learning. Yet crises also involve a high-stake game of political survival, in which accountability and learning pose a serious threat to incumbent politicians. The political decision of whether to appoint a commission of inquiry after a crisis thus provides a unique prism for studying the intense conflict between politics, accountability and policy learning. Using data from the United Kingdom, this study develops and tests a choice model for this political decision. The results show that the political decision to appoint inquiries into public crises is strongly influenced by short-term blame avoidance considerations, media salience and government popularity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 613-634 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | British Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reflection in the shadow of blame: When do politicians appoint commissions of inquiry?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver