TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between dental crowding and mandibular incisor proclination during orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent mandibular teeth
AU - Yitschaky, Oded
AU - Neuhof, Meital Segev
AU - Yitschaky, Michael
AU - Zini, Avraham
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
PY - 2016/9
Y1 - 2016/9
N2 - Objective: To examine changes in mandibular incisor proclination and protrusion resulting from alleviation of crowding. Materials and Methods: Records of 96 patients from a private practice treated without extractions or interproximal enamel reduction in the mandibular arch were included. Pre-and post-Treatment cephalograms and models were examined to determine changes in incisor proclination, protrusion and crowding. Results: For every millimeter of crowding alleviation, increases in incisor proclination (DIMPA) and protrusion (δL1 to A-Pog) of 0.5° and 0.2 mm, respectively, were found, on average. High variability was calculated for both linear variables (that can be reduced by incorporating other variables by multilinear regression). Conclusions: For every millimeter of crowding alleviated, 0.5° of proclination and 0.2 mm of protrusion are expected. Our results indicate that proclination is mulifactorial and cannot be explained solely by the amount of crowding alleviated during orthodontic treatment. These results may be a useful guiding principle rather than a prognostic tool.
AB - Objective: To examine changes in mandibular incisor proclination and protrusion resulting from alleviation of crowding. Materials and Methods: Records of 96 patients from a private practice treated without extractions or interproximal enamel reduction in the mandibular arch were included. Pre-and post-Treatment cephalograms and models were examined to determine changes in incisor proclination, protrusion and crowding. Results: For every millimeter of crowding alleviation, increases in incisor proclination (DIMPA) and protrusion (δL1 to A-Pog) of 0.5° and 0.2 mm, respectively, were found, on average. High variability was calculated for both linear variables (that can be reduced by incorporating other variables by multilinear regression). Conclusions: For every millimeter of crowding alleviated, 0.5° of proclination and 0.2 mm of protrusion are expected. Our results indicate that proclination is mulifactorial and cannot be explained solely by the amount of crowding alleviated during orthodontic treatment. These results may be a useful guiding principle rather than a prognostic tool.
KW - Cephalometric analysis
KW - Dental VTO
KW - Dental crowding
KW - Orthognathic surgery
KW - Self-ligating brackets
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984673707&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2319/080815-536.1
DO - 10.2319/080815-536.1
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 26991841
AN - SCOPUS:84984673707
SN - 0003-3219
VL - 86
SP - 727
EP - 733
JO - Angle Orthodontist
JF - Angle Orthodontist
IS - 5
ER -