TY - JOUR
T1 - Release of neurotransmitter induced by Ca2+-uncaging
T2 - Reexamination of the Ca-voltage hypothesis for release
AU - Sela, Rotem
AU - Segel, Lee
AU - Parnas, Itzchak
AU - Parnas, Hanna
PY - 2005/8
Y1 - 2005/8
N2 - The primacy of Ca2+ in controlling the amount of released neurotransmitter is well established. However, it is not yet clear what controls the time-course (initiation and termination) of release. Various experiments indicated that the time-course is controlled by membrane potential per se. Consequently the phenomenological Ca-Voltage-Hypothesis (CVH) was formulated. The CVH was later embodied in a molecular level mathematical model, whose key predictions were affirmed experimentally. Nonetheless, the single most important basis for the CVH, namely that depolarization per se is needed to induce physiological phasic release, was challenged by two major experimental findings. (i) Release was induced by Ca2+ alone by means of Ca2+-uncaging. (ii) There was at most a small additional effect when depolarization was applied after release was induced by Ca2+-uncaging. Point (i) was dealt with previously, but additional conclusions are drawn here. Here we concentrate on (ii) and show that the experimental results can be fully accounted for by the molecular level CVH model, with essentially the same parameters.
AB - The primacy of Ca2+ in controlling the amount of released neurotransmitter is well established. However, it is not yet clear what controls the time-course (initiation and termination) of release. Various experiments indicated that the time-course is controlled by membrane potential per se. Consequently the phenomenological Ca-Voltage-Hypothesis (CVH) was formulated. The CVH was later embodied in a molecular level mathematical model, whose key predictions were affirmed experimentally. Nonetheless, the single most important basis for the CVH, namely that depolarization per se is needed to induce physiological phasic release, was challenged by two major experimental findings. (i) Release was induced by Ca2+ alone by means of Ca2+-uncaging. (ii) There was at most a small additional effect when depolarization was applied after release was induced by Ca2+-uncaging. Point (i) was dealt with previously, but additional conclusions are drawn here. Here we concentrate on (ii) and show that the experimental results can be fully accounted for by the molecular level CVH model, with essentially the same parameters.
KW - Autoreceptor mediated fast release inhibition
KW - Mathematical model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24144480584&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10827-005-0187-4
DO - 10.1007/s10827-005-0187-4
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 16133822
AN - SCOPUS:24144480584
SN - 0929-5313
VL - 19
SP - 5
EP - 20
JO - Journal of Computational Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Computational Neuroscience
IS - 1
ER -