TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability and validity of the objective structured clinical examination in assessing surgical residents
AU - Cohen, Robert
AU - Reznick, Richard K.
AU - Taylor, Bryce R.
AU - Provan, John
AU - Rothma, Arthur
PY - 1990/9
Y1 - 1990/9
N2 - The purpose of this research was to assess reliability and construct validity of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for evaluating the clinical skills of surgical residents. Reliability refers to precision of the examination and construct validity to the degree to which the examination can discriminate between different levels of training. Twenty-seven second postgraduate year surgical residents took a 38-station OSCE representing seve surgical specialties and that tested history-taking, physical examination, problem-solving, technical skills, and attitudes. A couplet methodology was used wherein a patient encounter was followed by written questions aimed at testing problem-solving and patient management capabilities. Thirty-six standardized patiets were trained and 36 surgeons served as examiners marking from structured checklists. Overall reliability, Cronbach's alpha, was 0.89. Construct validity was examined by comparing the scores of the residents with those of a group of graduates of foreign medical schools applying for a "pre-internship" program. For 17 of 19 stations that both groups took, the residents performed significantly better (p<0.01). Individual station validity was significant for 32 of 38 stations (r=0.36 to 0.82, p<0.05). The examinations took 3.83 hours at a cost of $5,293 (Canadian dollars). The OSCE has been shown to be a reliable method of assessing clinical skills of surgical residents, construct validity as been established, and inter-item vilidity confirmed. Reliabilities achieved exceed those traditionally required for both acceptance and promotion decisions.
AB - The purpose of this research was to assess reliability and construct validity of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for evaluating the clinical skills of surgical residents. Reliability refers to precision of the examination and construct validity to the degree to which the examination can discriminate between different levels of training. Twenty-seven second postgraduate year surgical residents took a 38-station OSCE representing seve surgical specialties and that tested history-taking, physical examination, problem-solving, technical skills, and attitudes. A couplet methodology was used wherein a patient encounter was followed by written questions aimed at testing problem-solving and patient management capabilities. Thirty-six standardized patiets were trained and 36 surgeons served as examiners marking from structured checklists. Overall reliability, Cronbach's alpha, was 0.89. Construct validity was examined by comparing the scores of the residents with those of a group of graduates of foreign medical schools applying for a "pre-internship" program. For 17 of 19 stations that both groups took, the residents performed significantly better (p<0.01). Individual station validity was significant for 32 of 38 stations (r=0.36 to 0.82, p<0.05). The examinations took 3.83 hours at a cost of $5,293 (Canadian dollars). The OSCE has been shown to be a reliable method of assessing clinical skills of surgical residents, construct validity as been established, and inter-item vilidity confirmed. Reliabilities achieved exceed those traditionally required for both acceptance and promotion decisions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024994742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(06)80029-2
DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(06)80029-2
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 2393060
AN - SCOPUS:0024994742
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 160
SP - 302
EP - 305
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 3
ER -