Repeatability and reproducibility of fetal cardiac ventricular volume calculations using spatiotemporal image correlation and virtual organ computer-aided analysis

Neil Hamill, Roberto Romero*, Sonia S. Hassan, Wesley Lee, Stephen A. Myers, Pooja Mittal, Juan Pedro Kusanovic, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, Edi Vaisbuch, Jimmy Espinoza, Francesca Gotsch, Angela Carletti, Luís F. Gonçalves, Lami Yeo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. The objective of this study was to quantify the repeatability and reproducibility of fetal cardiac ventricular volumes obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis (VOCAL; GE Healthcare, Kretztechnik, Zipf, Austria). Methods. A technique was developed to compute ventricular volumes using the subfeature Contour Finder: Trace. Twenty-five normal pregnancies were evaluated for the following: (1) to compare the coefficient of variation (CV) of ventricular volumes obtained using 15° and 30° rotation; (2) to compare the CV between 3 methods of quantifying ventricular volumes: (a) Manual Trace, (b) Inversion Mode, and (c) Contour Finder: Trace; and (3) to determine repeatability by calculating agreement and reliability of ventricular volumes when each STIC was measured twice by 3 observers. Reproducibility was assessed by obtaining 2 STICs from each of 44 normal pregnancies. For each STIC, 2 ventricular volume calculations were performed, and agreement and reliability were evaluated. Additionally, measurement error was examined. Results. (1) Agreement was better with 15° rotation than 30° (15° : 3.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0%-4.2%; versus 30° : 7.1%; 95% CI, 5.8%-8.6%; P < .001); (2) ventricular volumes obtained with Contour Finder: Trace had better agreement than those obtained using either Inversion Mode (Contour Finder: Trace: 3.6%; 95% CI, 3.0%-4.2%; versus Inversion Mode: 6.0%; 95% CI, 4.9%-7.2%; P < .001) or Manual Trace (10.5%; 95% CI, 8.7%-12.5%; P < .001); (3) ventricular volumes were repeatable with good agreement and excellent reliability for both intraobserver and interobserver measurements; and (4) ventricular volumes were reproducible with negligible differences in agreement and good reliability. In addition, bias between STIC acquisitions was minimal (<1%; mean percent difference, -0.4%; 95% limits of agreement, -5.4%-5.9%). Conclusions. Fetal echocardiography using STIC and VOCAL allows repeatable and reproducible calculation of ventricular volumes with the subfeature Contour Finder: Trace.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1301-1311
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume28
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 3-dimensional echocardiography
  • 4-dimensional ultrasonography
  • Cardiac function
  • Contour finder
  • Fetal echocardiography
  • Fetus
  • Inversion mode
  • Ultrasonography
  • Ventricular volume

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Repeatability and reproducibility of fetal cardiac ventricular volume calculations using spatiotemporal image correlation and virtual organ computer-aided analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this