TY - JOUR
T1 - Repeatability and reproducibility of fetal cardiac ventricular volume calculations using spatiotemporal image correlation and virtual organ computer-aided analysis
AU - Hamill, Neil
AU - Romero, Roberto
AU - Hassan, Sonia S.
AU - Lee, Wesley
AU - Myers, Stephen A.
AU - Mittal, Pooja
AU - Kusanovic, Juan Pedro
AU - Chaiworapongsa, Tinnakorn
AU - Vaisbuch, Edi
AU - Espinoza, Jimmy
AU - Gotsch, Francesca
AU - Carletti, Angela
AU - Gonçalves, Luís F.
AU - Yeo, Lami
PY - 2009/10/1
Y1 - 2009/10/1
N2 - Objective. The objective of this study was to quantify the repeatability and reproducibility of fetal cardiac ventricular volumes obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis (VOCAL; GE Healthcare, Kretztechnik, Zipf, Austria). Methods. A technique was developed to compute ventricular volumes using the subfeature Contour Finder: Trace. Twenty-five normal pregnancies were evaluated for the following: (1) to compare the coefficient of variation (CV) of ventricular volumes obtained using 15° and 30° rotation; (2) to compare the CV between 3 methods of quantifying ventricular volumes: (a) Manual Trace, (b) Inversion Mode, and (c) Contour Finder: Trace; and (3) to determine repeatability by calculating agreement and reliability of ventricular volumes when each STIC was measured twice by 3 observers. Reproducibility was assessed by obtaining 2 STICs from each of 44 normal pregnancies. For each STIC, 2 ventricular volume calculations were performed, and agreement and reliability were evaluated. Additionally, measurement error was examined. Results. (1) Agreement was better with 15° rotation than 30° (15° : 3.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0%-4.2%; versus 30° : 7.1%; 95% CI, 5.8%-8.6%; P < .001); (2) ventricular volumes obtained with Contour Finder: Trace had better agreement than those obtained using either Inversion Mode (Contour Finder: Trace: 3.6%; 95% CI, 3.0%-4.2%; versus Inversion Mode: 6.0%; 95% CI, 4.9%-7.2%; P < .001) or Manual Trace (10.5%; 95% CI, 8.7%-12.5%; P < .001); (3) ventricular volumes were repeatable with good agreement and excellent reliability for both intraobserver and interobserver measurements; and (4) ventricular volumes were reproducible with negligible differences in agreement and good reliability. In addition, bias between STIC acquisitions was minimal (<1%; mean percent difference, -0.4%; 95% limits of agreement, -5.4%-5.9%). Conclusions. Fetal echocardiography using STIC and VOCAL allows repeatable and reproducible calculation of ventricular volumes with the subfeature Contour Finder: Trace.
AB - Objective. The objective of this study was to quantify the repeatability and reproducibility of fetal cardiac ventricular volumes obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and Virtual Organ Computer-Aided Analysis (VOCAL; GE Healthcare, Kretztechnik, Zipf, Austria). Methods. A technique was developed to compute ventricular volumes using the subfeature Contour Finder: Trace. Twenty-five normal pregnancies were evaluated for the following: (1) to compare the coefficient of variation (CV) of ventricular volumes obtained using 15° and 30° rotation; (2) to compare the CV between 3 methods of quantifying ventricular volumes: (a) Manual Trace, (b) Inversion Mode, and (c) Contour Finder: Trace; and (3) to determine repeatability by calculating agreement and reliability of ventricular volumes when each STIC was measured twice by 3 observers. Reproducibility was assessed by obtaining 2 STICs from each of 44 normal pregnancies. For each STIC, 2 ventricular volume calculations were performed, and agreement and reliability were evaluated. Additionally, measurement error was examined. Results. (1) Agreement was better with 15° rotation than 30° (15° : 3.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0%-4.2%; versus 30° : 7.1%; 95% CI, 5.8%-8.6%; P < .001); (2) ventricular volumes obtained with Contour Finder: Trace had better agreement than those obtained using either Inversion Mode (Contour Finder: Trace: 3.6%; 95% CI, 3.0%-4.2%; versus Inversion Mode: 6.0%; 95% CI, 4.9%-7.2%; P < .001) or Manual Trace (10.5%; 95% CI, 8.7%-12.5%; P < .001); (3) ventricular volumes were repeatable with good agreement and excellent reliability for both intraobserver and interobserver measurements; and (4) ventricular volumes were reproducible with negligible differences in agreement and good reliability. In addition, bias between STIC acquisitions was minimal (<1%; mean percent difference, -0.4%; 95% limits of agreement, -5.4%-5.9%). Conclusions. Fetal echocardiography using STIC and VOCAL allows repeatable and reproducible calculation of ventricular volumes with the subfeature Contour Finder: Trace.
KW - 3-dimensional echocardiography
KW - 4-dimensional ultrasonography
KW - Cardiac function
KW - Contour finder
KW - Fetal echocardiography
KW - Fetus
KW - Inversion mode
KW - Ultrasonography
KW - Ventricular volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74749086807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7863/jum.2009.28.10.1301
DO - 10.7863/jum.2009.28.10.1301
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 19778875
AN - SCOPUS:74749086807
SN - 0278-4297
VL - 28
SP - 1301
EP - 1311
JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
IS - 10
ER -