Reply to Ira Rabin's Comment on our paper Rasmussen etal. (2012)

Kaare Lund Rasmussen*, Anna Lluveras Tenorio, Ilaria Bonaduce, Maria Perla Colombini, Leila Birolo, Eugenio Galano, Angela Amoresano, Greg Doudna, Andrew D. Bond, Vincenzo Palleschi, Giulia Lorenzetti, Stefano Legnaioli, Johannes van der Plicht, Jan Gunneweg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the Comment by Dr. I. Rabin from Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung in Berlin are stated many conjectures and apparent guesses contradicting several of our interpretations. Most of Rabin's 'guesses' and interpretations are unwarranted. Below we rebut some of the misinterpretations under separate headings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-158
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • Ink
  • Qumran
  • Reply
  • Schoyen inkwell

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Ira Rabin's Comment on our paper Rasmussen etal. (2012)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this