Abstract
In our original paper we claimed for a possible symbolic value of the engraved aurochs bone shaft found at the Unit III of the Middle Paleolithic site of Nesher Ramla. In his comment to our original paper, Hodgson (2021) presents a contradictory interpretation, which mostly involved a proto-aesthetic source for early engravings. Here we clarify our point of view concerning the probable symbolic interpretation of the engraved bone and we challenge some of Hodgson's claims and arguments that neglected the archaeological and chrono-cultural contexts of this discovery.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 147-149 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Quaternary International |
Volume | 610 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 10 Feb 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA
Keywords
- Archaeozoology
- Engraving
- Middle paleolithic
- Non-utilitarian object
- Symbolism