Report of Consensus Panel 4 from the 12th International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia on the management of patients with non-IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma

  • Alessandra Tedeschi*
  • , Rebecca Auer
  • , Francesco Autore
  • , Jorge J. Castillo
  • , Moshe E. Gatt
  • , Eva Kimby
  • , David F. Moreno
  • , Roger G. Owen
  • , Lugui Qiu
  • , Aldo M. Roccaro
  • , Shayna Sarosiek
  • , Naohiro Sekiguchi
  • , John F. Seymour
  • , Marzia Varettoni
  • , Christopher J. Patterson
  • , Jeffrey V. Matous
  • , Christian Buske
  • , Steven P. Treon
  • , Ramon Garcia Sanz
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Approximately 95% of lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas (LPL) are IgM secreting and are characterized as Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM). Conversely, non-IgM secreting LPL are rare. As part of the 12th International Workshop on WM (IWWM-12), a consensus panel of experts was tasked to develop recommendations for the management and response assessment of non-IgM LPL. The panel considered that in view of available molecular, pathological and clinical data, non-IgM LPL should be considered as a separate sub-entity of LPL. The panel further recommended that the IWWM-2 consensus criteria used for IgM LPL (WM) treatment initiation, should also be used for non-IgM LPL and be independent of IgG or IgA paraprotein level unless symptomatic hyperviscosity is present. The panel agreed that based on current evidence, there is insufficient data to support a different clinical management for non-IgM vs IgM (WM) LPL. Moreover, the panel advised that patients with non-IgM LPL should be treated in a similar manner to patients with IgM LPL independent of MYD88 mutation status until more is known about its impact on treatment outcomes for non-IgM LPL patients. The panel therefore recommends the use of the IWWM-11 IgM LPL (WM) response criteria for cases of non-IgM LPL with a monoclonal IgA or IgG paraprotein component, but creating a specific panel to develop formal response criteria for this LPL subset was also recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-112
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in Hematology
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma
  • MYD88
  • Response assessment
  • Treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Report of Consensus Panel 4 from the 12th International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia on the management of patients with non-IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this