Responding to nonemergency calls for service via video: A randomized controlled trial

Stewart Gates, Barak Ariel*, Noy Assaraf

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Research summary: We tested the effectiveness of virtual response in policing as an alternative to the traditional physical presence of officers to nonemergency calls for service. We randomly assigned 1059 eligible calls to either virtual or in-person responses. We estimated the results in terms of waiting time, criminal justice outcomes, cost efficiency, and victim satisfaction based on a representative sample of telephone interviews. We found significant improvements across all measures when using a virtual response, including reduced victim waiting times, greater odds of arrest and charges, and enhanced perceptions of procedural justice, satisfaction, trust, and confidence in the police service. We found no adverse effects on victims due to the lack of physical presence. Research implications: These findings suggest that, as with e-health services, law enforcement can benefit from a cost–beneficial virtual response to nonemergency calls for service. We encourage its consideration as a mass deployment option in policing, as well as a basis for future experimental replications.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCriminology and Public Policy
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Criminology & Public Policy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society of Criminology.

Keywords

  • demand
  • nonemergency calls-for-service
  • police
  • randomized controlled trial
  • virtual response

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responding to nonemergency calls for service via video: A randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this