TY - JOUR
T1 - Response to:
T2 - Anthropology through Levinas (further reflections): on humanity, being, culture, violation, sociality, and morality by Nigel Rapport
AU - Wilf, Eitan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas poses a challenge to anthropology. For Levinas, the “secrecy of subjectivity,” the absolute incomprehensibility of one individual to another, is the fundamental fact of human being. It is also the foundation of morality, an ethical system, acknowledging the irreducible mystery and integrity of individuality as preceding any claim to knowledge, any legislation of culturo-symbolic construction. This article outlines some of the major tenets in a Levinasian metaphysic. It traces their biographical origin in Levinas’s experience of the Holocaust and their intellectual origin in a reading of the Old Testament where Abraham answers, “Here I am,” to a divine presence of which he has no possible experience. According to Levinas, each owes to the human Other the same “inspired” response as to the incomprehensibility of divinity. The article concludes by mooting a passable solution to the Levinasian challenge: a cosmopolitan anthropology that looks to write the individual life imaginatively while writing the human species systematically.
AB - The philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas poses a challenge to anthropology. For Levinas, the “secrecy of subjectivity,” the absolute incomprehensibility of one individual to another, is the fundamental fact of human being. It is also the foundation of morality, an ethical system, acknowledging the irreducible mystery and integrity of individuality as preceding any claim to knowledge, any legislation of culturo-symbolic construction. This article outlines some of the major tenets in a Levinasian metaphysic. It traces their biographical origin in Levinas’s experience of the Holocaust and their intellectual origin in a reading of the Old Testament where Abraham answers, “Here I am,” to a divine presence of which he has no possible experience. According to Levinas, each owes to the human Other the same “inspired” response as to the incomprehensibility of divinity. The article concludes by mooting a passable solution to the Levinasian challenge: a cosmopolitan anthropology that looks to write the individual life imaginatively while writing the human species systematically.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060759502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/701595
DO - 10.1086/701595
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.comment???
SN - 0011-3204
VL - 60
SP - 85
EP - 86
JO - Current Anthropology
JF - Current Anthropology
IS - 1
ER -