Abstract
Marom and Rak claim, on the basis of a few mandibular features, that the Nesher Ramla (NR) Homo is a Neanderthal. Their comments lack substance and contribute little to the debate surrounding the evolution of Middle Pleistocene Homo. Limitations and preconceptions in their study prevented them from achieving resolution beyond a dichotomous interpretation of the NR as either a Neanderthal or a modern human.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | eabl5789 |
| Journal | Science |
| Volume | 374 |
| Issue number | 6572 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 3 Dec 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Supported by grants from the Dan David Foundation, the Shmunis Family Anthropology Institute, the Leakey Foundation, the Care Archaeological Foundation, the Israel Science Foundation (1936/18, 1773/15), and the Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_156299/176319). C.F. was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation grant 31003A_176319.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Response to comment on “A middle pleistocene homo from Nesher Ramla, Israel”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver