Rethinking Moving beyond Deterrence: A Partial Replication Study

Eitan Alimi*, Gregory Maney

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


We assess Dugan and Chenoweth’s Rational Choice-based argument regarding moderating effects of indiscriminate conciliatory state actions on levels of terrorist attacks in Israel-Palestine, utilizing data drawn primarily from declassified security records on Israeli state actions during the First Intifada (1987–1992). This type of data source, we argue, contains a more accurate ratio of conciliatory to repressive actions than Dugan and Chenoweth’s media-based data, given state authorities’ attempts at concealing repressive actions while publicizing conciliatory actions during times of intense conflict. We discuss differences in results—including, most centrally, no support for the hypothesized effect of conciliatory state actions—highlighting the theoretical payoffs of examining the Political Process–related factor of varying levels of state control over the political environment.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)292-303
Number of pages12
JournalPolitical Studies Review
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.


  • Israel-Palestine
  • contentious politics
  • deterrence
  • state control
  • terrorism


Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking Moving beyond Deterrence: A Partial Replication Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this