Rhetoric in municipal amalgamations: a comparative analysis

Joseph Drew*, Eran Razin, Rhys Andrews

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is a large literature that seeks to evaluate municipal amalgamations ex post, but a relative dearth of scholarly inquiry into the practical political task of persuading the public to accept amalgamations ex ante. We address this important gap in the literature by conducting a rhetorical analysis to ascertain what types of arguments are believed to be efficacious for persuasion on amalgamation. We find evidence to suggest belief in the efficacy of persuading the public through recourse to various projected dreadful consequences, particularly amongst opponents of amalgamation. We conclude by considering some of the reasons behind the observed rhetorics and briefly outline one possible solution.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)748-767
Number of pages20
JournalLocal Government Studies
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Israel
  • Local government amalgamations
  • Wales
  • intransigent rhetoric
  • rhetoric of amalgamation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rhetoric in municipal amalgamations: a comparative analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this