Abstract
This article traces the trajectory of educational ideas through policy, curricular materials and enactment in the classroom. Specifically, I examine current English policy regarding the teaching of grammar in primary schools, and its enactment in a Year 3 (8-year olds) literacy lesson. While the policy advances a broadly rhetorical approach to grammar and its instruction, the enacted lesson retains a number of features characteristic of the formal, rule-based grammar instruction this policy seeks to replace. I discuss possible explanations for this outcome, and implications for language education policy. Among other issues, I argue that rhetorical grammar teaching has been thwarted by the "grammars" of schooling and educational accountability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 378-400 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Linguistics and Education |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Curricular enactment
- Educational policy and educational reform
- Grammar teaching
- National Literacy Strategy
- Rhetorical grammar
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rhetorical grammar and the grammar of schooling: Teaching "powerful verbs" in the English National Literacy Strategy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver