Risk functions for prediction of cardiovascular disease in elderly Australians: The Dubbo Study

Leon A. Simons*, Judith Simons, Yechiel Friedlander, John McCallum, Latha Palaniappan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate a Framingham risk function for coronary heart disease in an elderly Australian cohort and to derive a risk function for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in elderly Australians. Design and setting: Analysis of data from a prospective cohort study (the Dubbo Study) in a semi-urban town (population, 34 000). Participants: 2805 men and women 60 years and older living in the community, first assessed in 1988, and a subcohort of 2102 free of CVD at study entry. Main outcome measures: Incidence of CVD (myocardial infarction, coronary death or stroke) over 5 and 10 years. Results: A Framingham risk function assessing "hard" coronary heart disease (ie, myocardial infarction or coronary death) accurately predicted 10-year incidence in men and women aged 60-79 years who were free of prevalent CVD or diabetes at study entry. In a multiple logistic model, CVD incidence was significantly predicted by age, sex, taking antihypertensive medication, blood pressure, smoking, total cholesterol level and diabetes. For a given age and cholesterol level, CVD risk over 5 years was doubled in the presence of antihypertensive medication or diabetes, increased by 50% with cigarette smoking, and halved in women compared with men. Conclusions: We have derived a simple CVD risk function specifically for elderly Australians that employs risk factors readily accessible to all medical practitioners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-116
Number of pages4
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume178
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Feb 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk functions for prediction of cardiovascular disease in elderly Australians: The Dubbo Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this