Rites of Affirmation: The Past, Present, and Future of International Humanitarian Law

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter


In this chapter I identify, demonstrate, explain, and critique two narratives used, traditionally, in the writing of the past of international humanitarian law (IHL). One tells of IHL’s ineluctable progress, the other of its timeless, culture-less, universal immanence. These appear at odds: one narrates the dynamic process of restraining—and humanising—war through law; the other emphasises a constant and immutable idea of humanitarian restraint that inheres in any human civilisation. Culturally, nonetheless, these two narratives share the same function: both are used to affirm, to exogenous and endogenous audiences, faith in the project to humanise war. Deconstructing these narratives as forms of social memory suggests, however, that both types express and deal with epistemic anxieties about the present achievements of that project; both, in fact, allow IHL practitioners to come to terms with the present state of the project to humanise war by deferring the fulfilment of its promise to the indefinite future.
Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationYearbook of International Humanitarian Law
Subtitle of host publicationCultures of International Humanitarian Law
EditorsHeike. Krieger , Pablo. Kalmanovitz , Eliav. Lieblich , Rebecca. Mignot-Mahdavi
Place of PublicationThe Hague
PublisherT.M.C. Asser Press
Volume24 (2021)
StatePublished - 2023

Publication series

NameYearbook of International Humanitarian Law Series
PublisherT.M.C. Asser Press


Dive into the research topics of 'Rites of Affirmation: The Past, Present, and Future of International Humanitarian Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this