TY - JOUR
T1 - Rituximab maintenance for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma in first remission
T2 - Results of the randomized NHL13 trial
AU - Agmt-Nhl13 Investigators
AU - Jaeger, Ulrich
AU - Trneny, Marek
AU - Melzer, Helen
AU - Praxmarer, Michael
AU - Nawarawong, Weerasak
AU - Yehuda, Dina Ben
AU - Goldstein, David
AU - Mihaljevic, Bilijana
AU - Ilhan, Osman
AU - Ballova, Veronika
AU - Hedenus, Michael
AU - Hsiao, Liang Tsai
AU - Au, Wing Yan
AU - Burgstaller, Sonja
AU - Weidinger, Gerhard
AU - Keil, Felix
AU - Dittrich, Christian
AU - Skrabs, Cathrin
AU - Klingler, Anton
AU - Chott, Andreas
AU - Fridrik, Michael A.
AU - Greil, Richard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Ferrata Storti Foundation.
PY - 2015/7/6
Y1 - 2015/7/6
N2 - We investigated rituximab maintenance therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=662) or follicular lymphoma grade 3b (n=21) in first complete remission. Patients were randomized to rituximab maintenance (n=338) or observation (n=345). At a median follow-up of 45 months, the event-free survival rate (the primary endpoint) at 3 years was 80.1% for rituximab maintenance versus 76.5% for observation. This difference was not statistically significant for the intent-to-treat population (likelihood ratio P=0.0670). The hazard ratio by treatment arm was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.57-1.08; P=0.1433). The secondary endpoint, progression-free survival was also not met for the whole statistical model (likelihood ratio P=0.3646). Of note, rituximab maintenance was superior to observation when treatment arms only were compared (hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.90; P=0.0120). Overall survival remained unchanged (92.0 versus 90.3%). In subgroup analysis male patients benefited from rituximab maintenance with regards to both event-free survival (84.1% versus 74.4%) (hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.94; P=0.0267) and progression-free survival (89.0% versus 77.6%) (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.79; P=0.0058). Women had more grade 3/4 adverse events (P=0.0297) and infections (P=0.0341). Men with a low International Prognostic Index treated with rituximab had the best outcome. In summary, rituximab maintenance in first remission after R-CHOP-like treatment did not prolong eventfree, progression-free or overall survival of patients with aggressive B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The significantly better outcome of men warrants further studies prior to the routine use of rituximab maintenance in men with low International Prognostic Index. This trial is registered under EUDRACT #2005-005187-90 and www.clinicaltrials. gov as #NCT00400478.
AB - We investigated rituximab maintenance therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=662) or follicular lymphoma grade 3b (n=21) in first complete remission. Patients were randomized to rituximab maintenance (n=338) or observation (n=345). At a median follow-up of 45 months, the event-free survival rate (the primary endpoint) at 3 years was 80.1% for rituximab maintenance versus 76.5% for observation. This difference was not statistically significant for the intent-to-treat population (likelihood ratio P=0.0670). The hazard ratio by treatment arm was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.57-1.08; P=0.1433). The secondary endpoint, progression-free survival was also not met for the whole statistical model (likelihood ratio P=0.3646). Of note, rituximab maintenance was superior to observation when treatment arms only were compared (hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.90; P=0.0120). Overall survival remained unchanged (92.0 versus 90.3%). In subgroup analysis male patients benefited from rituximab maintenance with regards to both event-free survival (84.1% versus 74.4%) (hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.94; P=0.0267) and progression-free survival (89.0% versus 77.6%) (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.79; P=0.0058). Women had more grade 3/4 adverse events (P=0.0297) and infections (P=0.0341). Men with a low International Prognostic Index treated with rituximab had the best outcome. In summary, rituximab maintenance in first remission after R-CHOP-like treatment did not prolong eventfree, progression-free or overall survival of patients with aggressive B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The significantly better outcome of men warrants further studies prior to the routine use of rituximab maintenance in men with low International Prognostic Index. This trial is registered under EUDRACT #2005-005187-90 and www.clinicaltrials. gov as #NCT00400478.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936160629&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3324/haematol.2015.125344
DO - 10.3324/haematol.2015.125344
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 25911553
AN - SCOPUS:84936160629
SN - 0390-6078
VL - 100
SP - 955
EP - 963
JO - Haematologica
JF - Haematologica
IS - 7
ER -