Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Role of laparoscopy in rectal cancer: A review

  • Ido Mizrahi
  • , Haggi Mazeh*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite established evidence on the advantages of laparoscopy in colon cancer resection, the use of laparoscopy for rectal cancer resection is still controversial. The initial concern was mainly regarding the feasibility of laparoscopy to achieve an adequate total mesorectal excision specimen. These concerns have been raised following early studies demonstrating higher rates of circumferential margins positivity following laparoscopic resection, as compared to open surgery. Similar to colon resection, patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer resection are expected to benefit from a shorter length of hospital stay, less analgesic requirements, and a faster recovery of bowel function. In the past decade there have been an increasing number of large scale clinical trials investigating the oncological and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. In this review we summarize the current literature available on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4900-4907
Number of pages8
JournalWorld Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume20
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - 7 May 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Comparison
  • Laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal
  • Laparoscopy
  • Open resection
  • Outcomes
  • Rectal cancer
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Role of laparoscopy in rectal cancer: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this