RosettaDock in CAPRI rounds 6-12

Chu Wang, Ora Schueler-Furman, Ingemar Andre, Nir London, Sarel J. Fleishman, Philip Bradley, Bin Qian, David Baker*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

A challenge in protein-protein docking is to account for the conformational changes in the monomers that occur upon binding. The RosettaDock method, which incorporates sidechain flexibility but keeps the backbone fixed, was found in previous CAPRI rounds (4 and 5) to generate docking models with atomic accuracy, provided that conformational changes were mainly restricted to protein sidechains. In the recent rounds of CAPRI (6-12), large backbone conformational changes occur upon binding for several target complexes. To address these challenges, we explicitly introduced backbone flexibility in our modeling procedures by combining rigid-body docking with protein structure prediction techniques such as modeling variable hops and building homology models. Encouragingly, using this approach we were able to correctly predict a significant backbone conformational change of an interface loop for Target 20 (12 Å rmsd between those in the unbound monomer and complex structures), but accounting for backbone flexibility in protein-protein docking is still very challenging because of the significantly larger conformational space, which must be surveyed. Motivated by these CAPRI challenges, we have made progress in reformulating RosettaDock using a "fold-tree" representation, which provides a general framework for treating a wide variety of flexible-backbone docking problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)758-763
Number of pages6
JournalProteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
Volume69
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Keywords

  • CAPRI
  • Flexible-backbone docking
  • Homology docking
  • Loop modeling
  • Monte Carlo minimization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'RosettaDock in CAPRI rounds 6-12'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this