Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence following proctectomy

  • I. Mizrahi
  • , S. A. Chadi
  • , N. Haim
  • , D. R. Sands
  • , B. Gurland
  • , M. Zutshi
  • , S. D. Wexner*
  • , G. da Silva
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: This study assessed the effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for faecal incontinence (FI) following proctectomy with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Methods: An Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved database identified patients treated for FI following proctectomy (SNM-P) for benign or malignant disease, who were matched 1:1 according to preoperative Cleveland Clinic Florida Faecal Incontinence Scores (CCF-FIS) with patients without proctectomy (SNM-NP). Primary outcome was change in CCF-FIS. Results: Twelve patients (seven women) were in the SNM-P group and 12 (all women) were in the SNM-NP group. In the SNM-P group, six patients underwent proctectomy for low rectal cancer and five received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Five patients had handsewn anastomosis, and one had stapled coloanal anastomosis. One lead explantation occurred after a failed 2-week SNM percutaneous trial. Six patients underwent proctectomy for benign conditions. Within-group analyses revealed significant improvement in CCF-FIS in the SNM-P group (reduction from a score of 18 to a score of 14; P = 0.02), which was more profound for benign disease (reduction from 14.5 to 8.5) than for rectal cancer (reduction from 19.5 to 15). SNM was explanted in 66% and 33% of patients after proctectomy for malignant and benign conditions, respectively. In the SNM-NP group, 41% underwent overlapping sphincteroplasty. One patient received chemoradiation for anal cancer. Within-group analysis for the SNM-NP group showed significant improvement in CCF-FIS (a reduction from 17.5 to 4.0; P = 0.003). There was significant improvement in CCF-FIS in patients without previous proctectomy (mean delta CCF-FIS: 11.1 vs 4.7; P = 0.011). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) reaffirmed that controls outperformed proctectomy patients (P = 0.006). Conclusion: SNM for FI after proctectomy appears less effective than SNM in patients without proctectomy, with high device explantation rates, particularly after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and proctectomy for low rectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)O145-O152
JournalColorectal Disease
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Colorectal Disease © 2016 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Sacral nerve stimulation
  • chemoradiation
  • faecal incontinence
  • low rectal cancer
  • proctectomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence following proctectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this