Abstract
Several early rabbinic sources list verses that contain potential divine names. These names are classified as sacred when they refer to the Jewish God, and as not sacred when they refer to other entities, such as false gods or angels. This article argues that the core of the list was based on ancient Second Temple traditions that were modified. These changes were motivated by developments within Jewish thought and the shifting of conceptions and beliefs. Some of these changes were the result of internal rabbinic developments and others were the sages’ ambition to define the boundaries of Judaism, which sometimes carried a polemical response to Christian commentaries. This article proposes that analysis of these lists and the relationship between them can serve as an example for rabbinic attempts to reframe, rather than erase, their literary inheritance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 323-344 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Journal of Jewish Studies |
Volume | 74 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2023 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:cOpYRIGHT © Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies, 2023.